Jump to content

User talk:Prospectprospekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Prospectprospekt!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quicksand (1928).pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Justin (koavf)TCM 23:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:An Amorous History of the Silver Screen (1931).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, prospectprospekt (talk) 03:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, prospectprospekt (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AV1 encodes

[edit]

I have encoded Zaza first (currently uploading). Since the file uses the grain synth feature of the AV1 codec, the transcodes will presumably fail. Also, I fixed the frame rate of the film; the source file you linked is film NTSC, but there are actually 21 frames of content presented (with duplicates); I've fixed this, since we are not limited by the blu-ray spec. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! prospectprospekt (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I couldn't get the chunked uploader to work properly today, so, at least for now, I'm putting it on archive.org. When the upload is done, it'll be available at this link. I think you'll find the encode is of good quality. It's also only 2.9 GB. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning HathiTrust page images

[edit]

Can you point me in the right direction of removing the HathiTrust watermarks? (especially Google-digitized, public domain works) I found no download option that would get the images like yours. 103.219.194.134 03:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The url for upright images in the png format is https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/imgsrv/image?id={ID};seq={N};size=full;format=image/png;rotation=0. If rotation=0 is changed to rotation=180, the images will be upside down but the watermarks will still be on the bottom, so you could remove the watermarks by combining the upright and upside down images. prospectprospekt (talk) 04:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Thanks! 103.219.194.134 02:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have actually found a new way to do it —— just download the single page pdf and remove the last obj reference of the page obj! You can also use tools like this: https://github.com/StephenGenusa/PDF-Watermark-Remove. You may find this way much more convenient. 103.219.194.134 03:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I might be wrong, but I think that the PDFs have a lower resolution than the images. prospectprospekt (talk) 09:10, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can verify that pretty easily. 103.219.194.134 04:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Me at the Zoo

[edit]

Hi Prospectprospekt

At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Me at the zoo.webm you mentioned that you thought Karim was a joint owner, citing Commons:Joint authorship. However , that latter page does not say that we have a guideline allowing such works,it merely says Commons has no guideline on what to do if the person releasing it under the CC licence is a joint licence holder. As such, I think the precautionary principle should apply and we should delete it. And that's assuming he even is a joint owner, which I don't think was proven beyond doubt , given that the circumstances weren't proven. Or am I missing something? Cheers Amakuru (talk) 07:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Amakuru feel free to file a new deletion request if you feel that the rationale for keeping the file is lacking. I tried not to take a side on the joint authorship issue, but putting that aside, there is the question of if Karim is the sole author. The WMF says that "If someone wanted to take a picture of himself at a particular time and place, posed in a certain manner, but did not have a timer or tripod, and asked someone else to take the photo for him, most likely the person asking someone else to take his photo would be considered the sole author", but that is in contrast to Shah v. NYP Holdings, which concluded the opposite. prospectprospekt (talk) 20:29, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Kind of Bloop album cover.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]