User talk:Gbawden

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sakiko Miki: incorrectly and misleadingly ordered comments

You closed this discussion while it had incorrectly and misleadingly ordered comments. I am not blaming you for that, but I am asking you what (if anything) to do about it.

Special:Diff/785516010 really messed everything up. That edit inserted a new unsigned paragraph in the middle of an existing thread. I originally thought the new unsigned paragraph was by LilianaUWU. The comments below that, by Trade and Red-tailed hawk, really were in reply to LilianaUWU, but it is impossible to work that out without reviewing the page history.

Apparently, this is not the only time the user has disrupted a discussion in this way: User talk:Adamant1/Archive 1#Do not rearrange talk pages in a misleading way.

Normally, I would try to fix it myself. But this is an archived discussion, so I think I should not edit it. Brianjd (talk) 10:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Nette Wermeld Enström, Freelance Writer, Opulens Magazine.jpg

File talk:Nette Wermeld Enström, Freelance Writer, Opulens Magazine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Svartlo (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

19A file attribution

I used a photo from a publicly available state government website. I don't know how to find the permission you are asking me to provide. Annaminnesota (talk) 12:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a link to the site you took it from. You claimed this as own Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.house.mn.gov/members/profile/15627 Annaminnesota (talk) 13:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell me - edit the photo and most that link in the source field Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know how to do that Annaminnesota (talk) 13:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you active again

I thought maybe you were gone. Krok6kola (talk) 13:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krok6kola Hi. I took a much needed break from editing. Thanks for noticing ː) Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung meiner Wikimedia-Seite durch den Admin Gbawden am 19.5.2025

Wollte in Wikimedia ca. 25 Bilder einer wichtigen Ramayana-Rolle zur Verfügung stellen.

Zum Thema Pattachitra-Malerei sind bisher kaum Beispiele in Wikimedia zu finden.

siehe: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattachitra-Malerei

Dazu habe ich am 18. Mai zunächst eine Seite erstellt, in der ich die Rolle erkläre. Die Bilder wollte ich heute bzw. in den nächsten Tagen hochladen. Heute früh hat der Südafrikanische Administratur Gbawen meine Seite gelöscht, ohne mir Gelegenheit zu einer Erklärung zu geben. Ich vermute, er hat den Text auch nicht verstanden. Die Begründung war: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host!" Dies war natürlich auch nicht beabsichtigt. So macht es natürlich keinen Spaß, Beiträge für Wikimedia zu leisten. Ich beantrage, diese Löschung rückgängig zu machen. Vielen Dank Reiner David Reiner David-Ramayana (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reiner David-Ramayana The correct place to do that is Wikipedia- not commons Der richtige Ort dafür ist Wikipedia – nicht Commons Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, Sie haben nicht Recht.

Zum Hochladen von Bildern dient Wikimedia. In Wikipedia gibt es bereits einen Artikel, der aber noch nicht ausreichend belegt ist

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattachitra-Malerei

Mit meinen Bildern möchte ich wichtiges Material zur Verfügung stellen.

Bei der Bescheibung der Bilder steht nicht viel Text zum Erklären zur Verfügung. Bei einer Bilderrolle mit 20 Bildern ist es besser, auf einer Seite in WikiMEDIA die Details zu nennen.

Sie haben meinen Text nicht gelesen oder nicht verstanden.

Bitte stellen Sie meine Seite wieder her und entscheiden Sie in 2 Wochen über eine Löschung.

Danke.

Reiner David Reiner David-Ramayana (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]