User talk:Belbury

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Belbury.

This is the user talk page of Belbury, where you can send messages and comments to Belbury.

Be polite.
Be friendly.
Assume good faith.
No personal attacks.

Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Put new text under old text.
New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
Click here to start a new topic.

Archives

1, 2

Re: File tagging File:Full image of Tung Tung Tung Sahur.png

For the main context, see User talk:Fazoffic#File tagging File:Full image of Tung Tung Tung Sahur.png

@Belbury: So what about the other files in Category:Tung Tung Tung Sahur and Category:Italian brainrot memes? Isn't it written in COM:AI that In the United States, Indonesia and most other jurisdictions, only works by human authors qualify for copyright protection, Please note that this file was created in Indonesia. Do I need to put similar tags on other files in those categories because they "don't get permission"? Fazoffic (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fazoffic: How do we know that the named TikTok user was sharing an AI-generated image, rather than one that they'd found or edited from somewhere else? And if it is AI-generated, how do we know that it wasn't based on a pre-existing photograph (eg. "make this selfie look like a wooden puppet")? Belbury (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are many sources that discuss this. You can check it out at wikipedia:en:Italian brainrot. If you are still in doubt, you can visit the mentioned TikTok accounts. Fazoffic (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fazoffic: Thanks, as I understand it a press source saying an image is AI is good enough for Commons, I'll remove the permission template. Belbury (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

Hello dear Belbury. I nominated you for adminship. Waiting for your response. Best wishes. Kadı Message 22:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tupac Shakur.jpg

Yours sincerely, Howardcorn33 (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:London MMB »1T9 River Thames (cropped).jpg

File:London MMB »1T9 River Thames (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Adam37 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tewodros II image

I am not sure how to message on here. I want to request that my file be undeleted. It was not a personal photo. It was a realistic image of a historical figure for educational purposes. Could you please undelete my image of Tewodros that I think many people would appreciate? I really want to share it. Thank you so much :) Theclouds500skycapybara (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Theclouds500skycapybara, Please read The commons licensing policy and make sure the file meets these criteria . In addition, Belbury is not an admin (yet) and cannot undelete files. If you are sure it meets licensing and scope requirements, then you can file a request here All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 22:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I am still learning. I really hope this image can be shared with the world to help them understand what the historical Tewodros might have looked like. Theclouds500skycapybara (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing old comments

May I suggest that when you substantively change a comment is part of the flow of a discussion you should leave your old comment "struck out" (~~like this~~) rather than remove it entirely, so that someone who may have responded directly or indirectly to your prior comment isn't potentially left looking confused or confusing? (not an enormous issue, just a suggestion) - Jmabel ! talk 18:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Thanks, that's a good point about potential indirect responses. I can't tell either way if any was intended, but I've reverted my edit in case there was. Belbury (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one wasn't a terribly big deal, but I've seen people accidentally make someone else look like an idiot or lunatic, so it's just a good practice in general. - Jmabel ! talk 20:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]